Access, use and disposal of antimicrobials among humans and animals in Wakiso district, Uganda: a qualitative study

Musoke, David, Namata, Carol, Lubega, Grace Biyinzika, Kitutu, Freddy Eric, Mugisha, Lawrence, Amir, Saba, Brandish, Claire, Gonza, Joviah, Ikhile, Deborah, Niyongabo, Filimin, Ng, Bee Yean, O'Driscoll, Jean, Russell-Hobbs, Kate, Winter, Jody and Gibson, Linda (2021) Access, use and disposal of antimicrobials among humans and animals in Wakiso district, Uganda: a qualitative study. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, 14 (1). a69 1-12. ISSN 2052-3211

[img] PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Background
Inappropriate use of antimicrobials in both humans and animals is a key driver of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). In addition, human behaviours such as poor disposal of antimicrobials in the environment can increase their exposure to microbes which can impact on humans and animals. However, evidence on access, use and disposal of antimicrobials for humans and animals at community level in Uganda is limited. This study therefore explored access, use and disposal of antimicrobials among humans and animals in Wakiso district, Uganda.

Methods
A qualitative study was conducted that involved focus group discussions (FGDs) and key informant interviews (KIIs). Participants of the FGDs were community health workers (CHWs) and farmers involved in animal husbandry, while key informants included: officials from the Ministry of Health; Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries; human and animal health professionals; district health officials; and members of the national AMR surveillance committee. Twelve FGDs were held (8 for CHWs and 4 for farmers) while 15 KIIs were conducted. Thematic analysis in NVivo (version 12) was performed.

Results
Five main themes emerged from the study: access to antimicrobials in humans; access to antimicrobials in animals; use of antimicrobials in humans; use of antimicrobials in animals; and disposal of antimicrobials. Community members mainly accessed antimicrobials for humans from public health facilities such as government health centres, as well as private facilities, including drug shops and clinics. Antimicrobials for animals were obtained from veterinary practitioners and drug shops (both for humans and veterinary). Examples of inappropriate use of antimicrobials in both humans and animals was evident, such as sharing antibiotics among household members, and giving human-prescribed antimicrobials to food-producing animals as growth promoters. While some CHWs returned unused antimicrobials to public health facilities for proper disposal, community members mainly disposed of antimicrobials with general household waste including dumping in rubbish pits.

Conclusions
There is a need to increase awareness among the population on proper access, use and disposal of antimicrobials for both humans and animals. Development of a drug disposal system at community level would facilitate improved waste management of antimicrobials. Together, these measures would help prevent the rate of progression of AMR in communities.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: Brighton and Sussex Medical School > Primary Care and Public Health
SWORD Depositor: Mx Elements Account
Depositing User: Mx Elements Account
Date Deposited: 12 Jan 2022 09:03
Last Modified: 12 Jan 2022 09:15
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/103777

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update