Bu, Qingxiu (2021) The arbitrability of antitrust disputes: a Chinese perspective. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 10. pp. 1-23. ISSN 2050-0688
![]() |
PDF
- Accepted Version
Restricted to SRO admin only Download (525kB) |
![]() |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (395kB) |
Abstract
The cornerstone of public policy debate opens the door for arbitral tribunals to deal with antitrust disputes. It has long been a controversial issue whether antitrust disputes related to commercial contracts could be arbitrable, given the lack of clarity under Chinese law. China’s Supreme People’s Court in Shell v Huili has seemingly provided important but paradoxical guidance on non-arbitrability. Arguably, the ruling may be incompatible with the doctrine of international comity in the current transnational dispute resolution mechanism. It is argued that the operation costs for all stakeholders would be considerably reduced if China could integrate into the established international track.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Schools and Departments: | School of Law, Politics and Sociology > Law |
SWORD Depositor: | Mx Elements Account |
Depositing User: | Mx Elements Account |
Date Deposited: | 06 Dec 2021 09:16 |
Last Modified: | 22 Dec 2021 08:00 |
URI: | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/103228 |
View download statistics for this item
📧 Request an update