s41443-021-00514-8.pdf (435.88 kB)
“FGM” vs. female “cosmetic” surgeries: why do they continue to be treated separately?
Version 2 2023-06-12, 08:12
Version 1 2023-06-10, 01:52
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-12, 08:12 authored by Arianne ShahvisiArianne ShahvisiIn this article, I argue that the moral and legal distinction between “female genital cutting” and “female genital cosmetic surgeries” cannot be maintained without recourse to racist distinctions between the consent capacities of white women and women of colour. The physical procedures involved in these surgeries have significant overlap, as do their motivations, yet they are treated differently in everyday discourse and the law. This paper lays bare this double standard and presents and interrogates some of the reasons commonly given to justify their separate treatment. It concludes with the recommendation that the distinction be dropped in favour of more consistent consent-based stance, which avoids the racism and ethnocentrism that underwrites the present regime. According to this position, the only defensible moral and legal distinction is between those who can consent to these procedures, and those who cannot.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
International Journal of Impotence ResearchISSN
0955-9930Publisher
Springer NatureExternal DOI
Page range
1-5Department affiliated with
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2021-11-25First Open Access (FOA) Date
2022-01-10First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2021-11-25Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC