University of Sussex
Browse
collabra_2021_7_1_28202.pdf (823.58 kB)

Obtaining evidence for no effect

Download (823.58 kB)
Version 2 2023-06-12, 08:07
Version 1 2023-06-10, 01:20
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-12, 08:07 authored by Zoltan DienesZoltan Dienes
Obtaining evidence that something does not exist requires knowing how big it would be were it to exist. Testing a theory that predicts an effect thus entails specifying the range of effect sizes consistent with the theory, in order to know when the evidence counts against the theory. Indeed, a theoretically relevant effect size must be specified for power calculations, equivalence testing, and Bayes factors in order that the inferential statistics test the theory. Specifying relevant effect sizes for power, or the equivalence region for equivalence testing, or the scale factor for Bayes factors, is necessary for many journal formats, such as registered reports, and should be necessary for all articles that use hypothesis testing. Yet there is little systematic advice on how to approach this problem. This article offers some principles and practical advice for specifying theoretically relevant effect sizes for hypothesis testing.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

Collabra: Psychology

ISSN

2474-7394

Publisher

University of California Press

Issue

1

Volume

7

Page range

1-15

Article number

a28202

Department affiliated with

  • Psychology Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2021-10-08

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2021-10-08

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2021-10-07

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC