University of Sussex
Browse
Quadratic estimators for CMB weak lensing - Antony Lewis.pdf (1.2 MB)

Quadratic estimators for CMB weak lensing

Download (1.2 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-10, 00:19 authored by Abhishek S Maniyar, Yacine Ali-Haïmoud, Julien Carron, Antony LewisAntony Lewis, Mathew S Madhavacheril
In recent years, weak lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) has emerged as a powerful tool to probe fundamental physics, such as neutrino masses, primordial non-Gaussianity, dark energy, and modified gravity. The prime target of CMB lensing surveys is the lensing potential, which is reconstructed from the observed CMB temperature T and polarization E and B fields. Until very recently, this reconstruction has been performed with quadratic estimators (QEs), which, although known to be suboptimal for high-sensitivity experiments, are numerically efficient and useful to make forecasts and cross-check the results of more sophisticated likelihood-based methods. It is expected that ongoing and near-future CMB experiments, such as AdvACT, SPT-3G, and the Simons Observatory (SO), will also rely on QEs. In this work, we review different QEs and clarify and quantify their differences. In particular, we show that the Hu-Okamoto (HO02) estimator is not the absolute optimal lensing estimator that can be constructed out of quadratic combinations of T, E, and B fields. Instead, we derive the global-minimum-variance (GMV) lensing quadratic estimator. Although this estimator can be found elsewhere in the literature, it was erroneously described as equivalent to the HO02 estimator and has never been used in real data analyses. Here, we show explicitly that the HO02 estimator is suboptimal to the GMV estimator, with a reconstruction noise larger by up to ~9% for a SO-like experiment. We further show that the QE used in the Planck and recent SPT lensing analysis are suboptimal to both the HO02 and GMV estimator and would have a reconstruction noise up to ~11% larger than that of the GMV estimator for a SO-like experiment. In addition to clarifying differences between different QEs, this work should thus provide motivation to implement the GMV estimator in future lensing analyses relying on QEs.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

Physical Review D

ISSN

2470-0010

Publisher

American Physical Society

Issue

8

Volume

103

Page range

1-13

Article number

a083524

Department affiliated with

  • Physics and Astronomy Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2021-07-12

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2021-07-12

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2021-07-09

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC