Sussex Research Online: No conditions. Results ordered -Date Deposited. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/images/sitelogo.png Sussex Research Online: No conditions. Results ordered -Date Deposited. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ Sun, 26 Nov 2023 10:52:45 +0000 Sun, 26 Nov 2023 10:52:45 +0000 en Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:10:53 +0100 Registered replication report on Fischer, Castel, Dodd, and Pratt (2003) http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/92011/ http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/92011/ Colling, Lincoln J, Szűcs, Dénes, De Marco, Damiano, Cipora, Krzysztof, Ulrich, Rolf, Nuerk, Hans-Christoph, Soltanlou, Mojtaba, Bryce, Donna, Chen, Sau-Chin, Schroeder, Philipp Alexander, Henare, Dion T, Chrystall, Christine K, Corballis, Paul M, Ansari, Daniel, Goffin, Celia and others, (2020) Registered replication report on Fischer, Castel, Dodd, and Pratt (2003). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3 (2). pp. 143-162. ISSN 2515-2459 Thu, 09 Jan 2020 09:05:25 +0000 Why bayesian “evidence for H1” in one condition and bayesian “evidence for H0” in another condition does not mean good-enough bayesian evidence for a difference between the conditions http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/89246/ http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/89246/ Palfi, Bence and Dienes, Zoltan (2020) Why bayesian “evidence for H1” in one condition and bayesian “evidence for H0” in another condition does not mean good-enough bayesian evidence for a difference between the conditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3 (3). pp. 300-308. ISSN 2515-2459 Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:20:46 +0100 How do I know what my theory predicts? http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/85556/ http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/85556/ Dienes, Zoltan (2019) How do I know what my theory predicts? Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2 (4). pp. 364-377. ISSN 2515-2459 Tue, 28 Aug 2018 09:06:40 +0100 Many analysts, one data set: making transparent how variations in analytic choices affect results http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/78296/ http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/78296/ Silberzahn, R, Uhlmann, E L, Martin, D P, Anselmi, P, Aust, F, Awtrey, E, Bahník, Š, Bai, F, Bannard, C, Bonnier, E, Carlsson, R, Cheung, F, Christensen, G, Clay, R., Craig, M A, Rosa, A D, Dam, L, Evans, M H, Cervantes, I Flores, Fong, N, Gamez-Djokic, M, Glenz, A, Gordon-McKeon, S, Heaton, T J HEaton, Hederos, K, Heene, M, Mohr, A J Hofelich, Högden, F, Hui, K, Johannesson, M, Kalodimos, J, Kaszubowski, E, Kennedy, D M, Lei, R, Lindsay, T A, Liverani, S, Madan, C R, Molden, D, Molleman, E, Morey, R D, Mulder, L B, Nijstad, B.R, Pope, N G, Pope, B, Prenoveau, J M, Rink, F, Robusto, E, Roderique, H, Sandberg, A, Schlüter, E, Schönbrodt, F D, Sherman, M F, Sommer, S A, Sotak, K, Spain, S, Spörlein, C, Stafford, T, Stefanutti, L, Tauber, S, Ullrich, J, Vianello, M, Wagenmakers, E-J, Witkowiak, M, Yoon, S and Nosek, B A (2018) Many analysts, one data set: making transparent how variations in analytic choices affect results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1 (3). pp. 337-355. ISSN 2515-2459