University of Sussex
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Moral natural norms: a Kantian perspective on some Neo-Aristotelian arguments

chapter
posted on 2023-06-09, 16:07 authored by Katerina Deligiorgi
This chapter is concerned with a contemporary Aristotelian position in the philosophy, defended originally by Philippa Foot and subsequently by Michael Thompson, that aims to put this fact at the heart of the people's philosophical reflections about morality. Kant begins his ethics with the good. Clearing the ground for a metaphysics of the morals, he states that it is “impossible to think of anything at all in the world, or even beyond it, that could be considered good without the limitation except a good will”. Anscombe offers a subtle diagnosis of modern moral philosophy, because of her brevity of expression, some care is needed in reconstructing her argument. Self-legislation, or more accurately, rational self-legislation, is a metaphor for rational order of moral norms. The traditional concern with Kantian ethics is its non-naturalism. Practical syllogism is not about choice of ends.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Accepted version

Publisher

Routledge

Page range

1-21

Pages

330.0

Book title

Responses to naturalism: critical perspectives from idealism and pragmatism

Place of publication

New York

ISBN

9781315180854

Department affiliated with

  • Philosophy Publications

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Editors

Paul Giladi

Legacy Posted Date

2018-12-03

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2018-11-30

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC