University of Sussex
Browse
Tekola_Stigma_and_research_ethics.pdf (262.09 kB)

Impact of social stigma on the process of obtaining informed consent for genetic research on podoconiosis: a qualitative study

Download (262.09 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-07, 16:09 authored by Fasil Tekola, Susan Bull, Bobbie FarsidesBobbie Farsides, Melanie NewportMelanie Newport, Adebowale Adeyemo, Charles N Rotimi, Gail DaveyGail Davey
Background The consent process for a genetic study is challenging when the research is conducted in a group stigmatized because of beliefs that the disease is familial. Podoconiosis, also known as 'mossy foot', is an example of such a disease. It is a condition resulting in swelling of the lower legs among people exposed to red clay soil. It is a very stigmatizing problem in endemic areas of Ethiopia because of the widely held opinion that the disease runs in families and is untreatable. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of social stigma on the process of obtaining consent for a study on the genetics of podoconiosis in Southern Ethiopia. Methods We adapted a rapid assessment tool validated in The Gambia. The methodology was qualitative involving focus-group discussions (n = 4) and in-depth interviews (n = 25) with community members, fieldworkers, researchers and staff of the Mossy Foot Treatment and Prevention Association (MFTPA) working on prevention and treatment of podoconiosis. Results We found that patients were afraid of participation in a genetic study for fear the study might aggravate stigmatization by publicizing the familial nature of the disease. The MFTPA was also concerned that discussion about the familial nature of podoconiosis would disappoint patients and would threaten the trust they have in the organization. In addition, participants of the rapid assessment stressed that the genetic study should be approved at family level before prospective participants are approached for consent. Based on this feedback, we developed and implemented a consent process involving community consensus and education of fieldworkers, community members and health workers. In addition, we utilized the experience and established trust of the MFTPA to diminish the perceived risk. Conclusion The study showed that the consent process developed based on issues highlighted in the rapid assessment facilitated recruitment of participants and increased their confidence that the genetic research would not fuel stigma. Therefore, investigators must seek to assess and address risks of research from prospective participants' perspectives. This involves understanding the issues in the society, the culture, community dialogues and developing a consent process that takes all these into consideration.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

BMC Medical Ethics

ISSN

1472-6939

Publisher

BioMed Central

Issue

13

Volume

10

Department affiliated with

  • Clinical and Experimental Medicine Publications

Notes

Article Number: 13

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2011-08-26

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2016-03-22

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2016-11-10

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC