Measurement properties of depression questionnaires in patients with diabetes: a systematic review

van Dijk, Susan E M, Adriaanse, Marcel C, van der Zwaan, Lennart, Bosmans, Judith E, van Marwijk, Harm W J, van Tulder, Maurits W and Terwee, Caroline B (2018) Measurement properties of depression questionnaires in patients with diabetes: a systematic review. Quality of Life Research. ISSN 0962-9343

[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Restricted to SRO admin only until 2 February 2019.

Download (902kB)

Abstract

Purpose: To conduct a systematic review on measurement properties of questionnaires measuring depressive symptoms in adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature in MEDLINE, EMbase and PsycINFO was performed. Full text, original
articles, published in any language up to October 2016 were included. Eligibility for inclusion was independently assessed by three reviewers who worked in pairs. Methodological quality of the studies was evaluated by two independent reviewers using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Quality of the questionnaires was rated per measurement property, based on the number and quality of the included studies and the reported results.
Results: Of 6286 unique hits, 21 studies met our criteria evaluating nine different questionnaires in multiple settings and languages. The methodological quality of the included studies was variable for the different measurement properties: 9/15 studies scored ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ on internal consistency, 2/5 on reliability, 0/1 on content validity, 10/10 on structural validity, 8/11 on hypothesis testing, 1/5 on cross-cultural validity, and 4/9 on criterion validity. For the CES-D, there was strong evidence for good internal consistency, structural validity, and construct validity; moderate evidence for good criterion
validity; and limited evidence for good cross-cultural validity. The PHQ-9 and WHO-5 also performed well on several
measurement properties. However, the evidence for structural validity of the PHQ-9 was inconclusive. The WHO-5 was less
extensively researched and originally not developed to measure depression.
Conclusion: Currently, the CES-D is best supported for measuring depressive symptoms in diabetes patients.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: Brighton and Sussex Medical School > Primary Care and Public Health
Depositing User: Rosie Harvey
Date Deposited: 06 Feb 2018 16:07
Last Modified: 07 Feb 2018 11:45
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/73378

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update