Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes: Effects of geographic and taxonomic biases

De Palma, Adriana, Abrahamczyk, Stefan, Aizen, Marcelo A, Albrecht, Matthias, Basset, Yves, Bates, Adam, Blake, Robin J, Boutin, Céline, Bugter, Rob, Connop, Stuart, Cruz-López, Leopoldo, Cunningham, Saul A, Darvill, Ben, Diekötter, Tim, Dorn, Silvia, Downing, Nicola, Entling, Martin H, Farwig, Nina, Felicioli, Antonio, Fonte, Steven J, Fowler, Robert, Franzén, Markus, Goulson, Dave, Grass, Ingo, Hanley, Mick E, Hendrix, Stephen D, Herrmann, Farina, Herzog, Felix, Holzschuh, Andrea, Jauker, Birgit, Kessler, Michael, Knight, M E, Kruess, Andreas, Lavelle, Patrick, Le Féon, Violette, Lentini, Pia, Malone, Louise A, Marshall, Jon, Pachón, Eliana Martínez, McFrederick, Quinn S, Morales, Carolina L, Mudri-Stojnic, Sonja, Nates-Parra, Guiomar, Nilsson, Sven G, Öckinger, Erik, Osgathorpe, Lynne, Parra-H, Alejandro, Peres, Carlos A, Persson, Anna S, Petanidou, Theodora, Poveda, Katja, Power, Eileen F, Quaranta, Marino, Quintero, Carolina, Rader, Romina, Richards, Miriam H, Roulston, T’ai, Rousseau, Laurent, Sadler, Jonathan P, Samnegård, Ulrika, Schellhorn, Nancy A, Schüepp, Christof, Schweiger, Oliver, Smith-Pardo, Allan H, Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf, Stout, Jane C, Tonietto, Rebecca K, Tscharntke, Teja, Tylianakis, Jason M, Verboven, Hans A F, Vergara, Carlos H., Verhulst, Jort, Westphal, Catrin, Yoon, Hyung Joo and Purvis, Andy (2016) Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes: Effects of geographic and taxonomic biases. Scientific Reports, 6 (1). ISSN 2045-2322

[img] PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Land-use change and intensification threaten bee populations worldwide, imperilling pollination services. Global models are needed to better characterise, project, and mitigate bees' responses to these human impacts. The available data are, however, geographically and taxonomically unrepresentative; most data are from North America and Western Europe, overrepresenting bumblebees and raising concerns that model results may not be generalizable to other regions and taxa. To assess whether the geographic and taxonomic biases of data could undermine effectiveness of models for conservation policy, we have collated from the published literature a global dataset of bee diversity at sites facing land-use change and intensification, and assess whether bee responses to these pressures vary across 11 regions (Western, Northern, Eastern and Southern Europe; North, Central and South America; Australia and New Zealand; South East Asia; Middle and Southern Africa) and between bumblebees and other bees. Our analyses highlight strong regionally-based responses of total abundance, species richness and Simpson's diversity to land use, caused by variation in the sensitivity of species and potentially in the nature of threats. These results suggest that global extrapolation of models based on geographically and taxonomically restricted data may underestimate the true uncertainty, increasing the risk of ecological surprises.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: School of Life Sciences > Evolution, Behaviour and Environment
Depositing User: Robert Fowler
Date Deposited: 29 Sep 2017 09:45
Last Modified: 29 Sep 2017 09:45
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/70375

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update