University of Sussex
Browse
s10519-016-9825-z.pdf (524.24 kB)

Using twins to better understand sibling relationships

Download (524.24 kB)
Version 2 2023-06-13, 14:46
Version 1 2023-06-09, 03:35
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-13, 14:46 authored by Katharine M Mark, Alison PikeAlison Pike, Rachel M Latham, Bonamy R Oliver
We compared the nature of the sibling relationship in dyads of varying genetic relatedness, employing a behavioural genetic design to estimate the contribution that genes and the environment have on this familial bond. Two samples were used—the Sisters and Brothers Study consisted of 173 families with two target non-twin children (mean ages = 7.42 and 5.22 years respectively); and the Twins, Family and Behaviour study included 234 families with two target twin children (mean age = 4.70 years). Mothers and fathers reported on their children’s relationship with each other, via a postal questionnaire (the Sisters and Brothers Study) or a telephone interview (the Twins, Family and Behaviour study). Contrary to expectations, no mean level differences emerged when monozygotic twin pairs, dizygotic twin pairs, and non-twin pairs were compared on their sibling relationship quality. Behavioural genetic analyses also revealed that the sibling bond was modestly to moderately influenced by the genetic propensities of the children within the dyad, and moderately to substantially influenced by the shared environment common to both siblings. In addition, for sibling negativity, we found evidence of twin-specific environmental influence—dizygotic twins showed more reciprocity than did non-twins. Our findings have repercussions for the broader application of results from future twin-based investigations.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

Behavior Genetics

ISSN

0001-8244

Publisher

Springer Verlag

Issue

2

Volume

47

Page range

202-214

Department affiliated with

  • Psychology Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2016-10-18

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2017-02-20

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2016-10-19

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC