CLQBu.pdf (152.77 kB)
The Ralls implications for the National Security Review
The potential national security effect of foreign acquisitions has been a long standing issue facing the host states worldwide, which holds particular true between those adversary nations, like the United States and China. Such unexpected consequences as plausible protectionism and governance discrimination are detrimental to the global economic recovery. The creation of China's own national security review (NSR) regime complicates further the perceived retaliatory measures. To pierce the veil of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' (CFIUS) process of NSR is conducive to mitigating unnecessary stalemate between the two world economic giants in the scenarios of cross-border investments. 'Ralls' serves as a landmark case for a Chinese company to challenge the US President's and CFIUS's divesture orders. It remains uncertain of the extent to which the CFIUS's future NSR assessment procedures will be reshaped followed by the US executive's setback in the lawsuit. Through maintaining a predictable regulatory landscape, it is crucial to strike a balance between encouraging foreign investment and protecting national security.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
Commercial Law QuarterlyISSN
0819-4262Publisher
RMIT PublishingIssue
1Volume
30Page range
3-16Department affiliated with
- Law Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2016-08-18First Open Access (FOA) Date
2016-08-22First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2016-08-22Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC