Beyond the ‘East-West’ dichotomy: global variation in cultural models of selfhood

Vignoles, Vivian L, Owe, Ellinor, Becker, Maja, Smith, Peter B, Easterbrook, Matthew J, Brown, Rupert, González, Roberto, Didier, Nicolas, Carrasco, Diego, Cadena, Maria Paz, Lay, Siugmin, Schwartz, Seth J, Des Rosiers, Sabrina E, Villamar, Juan A, Gavreliuc, Alin, Zinkeng, Martina, Kreuzbauer, Robert, Baguma, Peter, Martin, Mariana, Tatarko, Alexander, Herman, Ginette, de Sauvage, Isabelle, Courtois, Marie, Garðarsdóttir,, Ragna B, Harb, Charles, Schweiger Gallo, Inge, Prieto Gil, Paulo, Lorente Clemares, Raquel, Campara, Gabriella, Nizharadze, George, Macapagal, Ma Elizabeth J, Jalal, Baland, Bourguignon, David, Zhang, Jianxin, Lv, Shaobo, Chybicka, Aneta, Yuki, Masaki, Zhang, Xiao, Espinosa, Agustin, Valk, Aune, Abuhamdeh, Sami, Amponsah, Benjamin, Özgen, Emre, Güner, E Ülkü, Yamakoğlu, Nil, Chobthamkit, Phatthanakit, Pyszczynski, Tom, Kesebir, Pelin, Vargas Trujillo, Elvia, Balanta, Paolo, Cendales Ayala, Boris, Koller, Silvia H, Jaafar, Jas Laile, Gausel, Nicolay, Fischer, Ronald, Milfont, Taciano L, Kusdil, Ersin, Çağlar, Selinay, Aldhafri, Said, Ferreira, M Cristina, Mekonnen, Kassahun Habtamu, Wang, Qian, Fülöp, Márta, Torres, Ana, Camino, Leoncio, Lemos, Flávia Cristina Silveira, Fritsche, Immo, Möller, Bettina, Regalia, Camillo, Manzi, Claudia, Brambilla, Maria and Bond, Michael Harris (2016) Beyond the ‘East-West’ dichotomy: global variation in cultural models of selfhood. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145 (8). pp. 966-1000. ISSN 0096-3445

[img] PDF (This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record) - Accepted Version
Download (1MB)

Abstract

Markus and Kitayama’s (1991) theory of independent and interdependent self-construals had a major influence on social, personality and developmental psychology by highlighting the role of culture in psychological processes. However, research has relied excessively on contrasts between North American and East Asian samples, and commonly-used self-report measures of independence and interdependence frequently fail to show predicted cultural differences. We revisited the conceptualization and measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals in two large-scale multinational surveys, using improved methods for cross-cultural research. We developed (Study 1: N = 2924 students in 16 nations) and validated across cultures (Study 2: N = 7279 adults from 55 cultural groups in 33 nations) a new seven-dimensional model of self-reported ways of being independent or interdependent. Patterns of global variation support some of Markus and Kitayama’s predictions, but a simple contrast between independence and interdependence does not adequately capture the diverse models of selfhood that prevail in different world regions. Cultural groups emphasize different ways of being both independent and interdependent, depending on individualism-collectivism, national socioeconomic development, and religious heritage. Our seven-dimensional model will allow future researchers to test more accurately the implications of cultural models of selfhood for psychological processes in diverse ecocultural contexts

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: School of Psychology > Psychology
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion
Depositing User: Lene Hyltoft
Date Deposited: 16 Jun 2016 08:34
Last Modified: 06 Mar 2017 21:47
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/61523

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update