University of Sussex
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

ALMA and Herschel reveal that X-ray-selected AGN and main-sequence galaxies have different star formation rate distributions

journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-09, 00:14 authored by Mark Sargent, J R Mullaney, D M Alexander, J Aird, E Bernhard, E Daddi, A Del Moro, M Dickinson, D Elbaz, C M Harrison, S Juneau, D Liu, M Pannella, D Rosario, P Santini, C Schreiber, J Simpson, F Stanley
Using deep Herschel and ALMA observations, we investigate the star formation rate (SFR) distributions of X-ray-selected active galactic nucleus (AGN) host galaxies at 0.5 < z < 1.5 and 1.5 < z < 4, comparing them to that of normal, star-forming (i.e. `main-sequence', or MS) galaxies. We find that 34-55 per cent of AGNs in our sample have SFRs at least a factor of 2 below that of the average MS galaxy, compared to ˜15 per cent of all MS galaxies, suggesting significantly different SFR distributions. Indeed, when both are modelled as lognormal distributions, the mass and redshift-normalized SFR distributions of X-ray AGNs are roughly twice as broad, and peak ˜0.4 dex lower, than that of MS galaxies. However, like MS galaxies, the normalized SFR distribution of AGNs in our sample appears not to evolve with redshift. Despite X-ray AGNs and MS galaxies having different SFR distributions, the linear-mean SFR of AGNs derived from our distributions is remarkably consistent with that of MS galaxies, and thus with previous results derived from stacked Herschel data. This apparent contradiction is due to the linear-mean SFR being biased by bright outliers, and thus does not necessarily represent a true characterization of the typical SFR of X-ray AGNs.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Accepted version

Journal

Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society

ISSN

1745-3925

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Issue

1

Volume

453

Page range

L83-L87

Department affiliated with

  • Physics and Astronomy Publications

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2016-02-09

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2016-02-08

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC