Can we set a global threshold age to define mature forests?

Martin, Philip, Jung, Martin, Brearley, Francis Q, Ribbons, Relena R, Lines, Emily R and Jacob, Aerin L (2016) Can we set a global threshold age to define mature forests? PeerJ, 4. e1595. ISSN 2167-8359

[img] PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (852kB)

Abstract

Globally, mature forests appear to be increasing in biomass density (BD). There is disagreement whether these increases are the result of increases in atmospheric CO2 concentrations or a legacy effect of previous land-use. Recently, it was suggested that a threshold of 450 years should be used to define mature forests and that many forests increasing in BD may be younger than this. However, the study making these suggestions failed to account for the interactions between forest age and climate. Here we revisit the issue to identify: (1) how climate and forest age control global forest BD and (2) whether we can set a threshold age for mature forests. Using data from previously published studies we modelled the impacts of forest age and climate on BD using linear mixed effects models. We examined the potential biases in the dataset by comparing how representative it was of global mature forests in terms of its distribution, the climate space it occupied, and the ages of the forests used. BD increased with forest age, mean annual temperature and annual precipitation. Importantly, the effect of forest age increased with increasing temperature, but the effect of precipitation decreased with increasing temperatures. The dataset was biased towards northern hemisphere forests in relatively dry, cold climates. The dataset was also clearly biased towards forests <250 years of age. Our analysis suggests that there is not a single threshold age for forest maturity. Since climate interacts with forest age to determine BD, a threshold age at which they reach equilibrium can only be determined locally. We caution against using BD as the only determinant of forest maturity since this ignores forest biodiversity and tree size structure which may take longer to recover. Future research should address the utility and cost-effectiveness of different methods for determining whether forests should be classified as mature.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Biomass, Forest, Succession, Climate, Mature forest, Carbon, REDD+, Forest recovery
Schools and Departments: School of Life Sciences > Evolution, Behaviour and Environment
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH0301 Biology > QH0540 Ecology
Q Science > QK Botany
Depositing User: Martin Jung
Date Deposited: 04 Feb 2016 10:26
Last Modified: 07 Mar 2017 04:14
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/59542

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update