University of Sussex
Browse
JCBC-Entropy-manuscript-R3.pdf (737.74 kB)

DNA entropy reveals a significant difference in complexity between housekeeping and tissue specific gene promoters

Download (737.74 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-09, 00:07 authored by David Thomas, Christopher Finan, Melanie NewportMelanie Newport, Susan Jones
BACKGROUND The complexity of DNA can be quantified using estimates of entropy. Variation in DNA complexity is expected between the promoters of genes with different transcriptional mechanisms; namely housekeeping (HK) and tissue specific (TS). The former are transcribed constitutively to maintain general cellular functions, and the latter are transcribed in restricted tissue and cells types for specific molecular events. It is known that promoter features in the human genome are related to tissue specificity, but this has been difficult to quantify on a genomic scale. If entropy effectively quantifies DNA complexity, calculating the entropies of HK and TS gene promoters as profiles may reveal significant differences. RESULTS Entropy profiles were calculated for a total dataset of 12,003 human gene promoters and for 501 housekeeping (HK) and 587 tissue specific (TS) human gene promoters. The mean profiles show the TS promoters have a significantly lower entropy (p<2.2e-16) than HK gene promoters. The entropy distributions for the 3 datasets show that promoter entropies could be used to identify novel HK genes. CONCLUSION Functional features comprise DNA sequence patterns that are non-random and hence they have lower entropies. The lower entropy of TS gene promoters can be explained by a higher density of positive and negative regulatory elements, required for genes with complex spatial and temporary expression.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Accepted version

Journal

Computational Biology and Chemistry

ISSN

1476-928X

Publisher

Elsevier

Volume

58

Page range

19-24

Department affiliated with

  • BSMS Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2016-01-21

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2019-08-16

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2019-08-16

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC