The diffusion of risks in public private partnership contracts

Demirag, Istemi, Khadaroo, Iqbal, Stapleton, Pamela and Stevenson, Caral (2012) The diffusion of risks in public private partnership contracts. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 25 (8). pp. 1317-1339. ISSN 0951-3574

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Purpose – The UK government argues that the benefits of public private partnership (PPP) in delivering public infrastructure stem from transferring risks to the private sector within a structure in which financiers put their own capital at risk, and the performance-based payment mechanism, reinforced by the due diligence requirements imposed by the lenders financing the projects. Prior studies of risk in PPPs have investigated “what” risks are allocated and to “whom”, that is to the public or the private sector. The purpose of this study is to examine “how” and “why” PPP risks are diffused by their financiers.

Design/methodology/approach – This study focuses on the financial structure of PPPs and on their financiers. Empirical evidence comes from interviews conducted with equity and debt financiers.

Findings – The findings show that the financial structure of the deals generates risk aversion in both debt and equity financiers and that the need to attract affordable finance leads to risk diffusion through a network of companies using various means that include contractual mitigation through insurance, performance support guarantees, interest rate swaps and inflation hedges. Because of the complexity this process generates, both procurers and suppliers need expensive expert advice. The risk aversion and diffusion and the consequent need for advice add cost to the projects, impacting on the government’s economic argument for risk transfer.

Originality/value – The expectation inherent in PPP is that the private sector will better manage those risks allocated to it and because private capital is at risk, financiers will perform due diligence with the ultimate outcome that only viable projects will proceed. This paper presents empirical evidence that raises questions about these expectations.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: School of Business, Management and Economics > Business and Management
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance
H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance > HJ9701 Public accounting. Auditing
Depositing User: Iqbal Khadaroo
Date Deposited: 18 Jan 2016 10:17
Last Modified: 25 Jan 2018 09:39
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/59260
📧 Request an update