Serious case review findings on the challenges of self-neglect: indicators for good practice

Braye, Suzy, Orr, David and Preston-Shoot, Michael (2015) Serious case review findings on the challenges of self-neglect: indicators for good practice. Journal of Adult Protection, 17 (2). pp. 75-87. ISSN 1466-8203

[img] PDF (This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/53035. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere) - Accepted Version
Restricted to SRO admin only until 2017.

Download (655kB)

Abstract

Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to analyse in detail the findings from 40 serious case reviews (SCRs) involving adults who self-neglect, and to consider the commissioning and reporting of such inquiries in the context of accountability that also involves the Coroner and the Local Government Ombudsman.

Design/methodology/approach
– This study comprised a cross-case analysis of 32 SCRs, using a four-layer design of the adult and their living context, the team around the adult, the organisations around the team, and the Local Safeguarding Board around the organisations.

Findings
– Available reports tend towards description of events rather than appraisal of what influenced practice. They highlight the challenges in cases of self-neglect practice, including person-centred approaches, capacity assessment and securing engagement. Familiar themes emerge when the spotlight turns to professional and organisational networks, namely information-sharing, supervision, recording and compliance with procedures and legal rules. Some Local Safeguarding Adults Boards found the process of conducting and then using serious case reviews for service improvement challenging.

Research limitations/implications
– The cross-case approach to thematic analysis focuses on reports into situations where outcomes of professional and organisational intervention had been disappointing. Nonetheless, the themes derived from this analysis are similar to other research findings on what represents best practice when working with cases involving self-neglect.

Practical implications
– The paper identifies learning for the effective commissioning and conduct of SCRs, and for service improvement with respect to practice with adults who self-neglect.

Originality/value
– The paper offers further detailed analysis of a large sample of SCRs that builds the evidence-base for effective practice with adults who self-neglect and for efficient management of process of commissioning and conducting SCRs.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: School of Education and Social Work > Social Work and Social Care
Subjects: H Social Sciences
H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine > RA0773 Personal health and hygiene Including clothing, bathing, exercise, travel, nutrition, sleep, sex hygiene
Depositing User: Pascale Fanning-Tichborne
Date Deposited: 23 Feb 2015 09:42
Last Modified: 07 Mar 2017 07:47
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/53035

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update
Project NameSussex Project NumberFunderFunder Ref
Scoping the issues around self-neglect in social care and allied health and welfare adult servicesG1095Skills for CareUnset