We can work it out: an enactive look at cooperation

Fantasia, Valentina, De Jaegher, Hanne and Fasulo, Alessandra (2014) We can work it out: an enactive look at cooperation. Frontiers in Psychology. ISSN 1664-1078

[img]
Preview
PDF (This Document is Protected by copyright and was first published by Frontiers. All rights reserved. it is reproduced with permission.) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (408kB) | Preview

Abstract

The past years have seen an increasing debate on cooperation and its unique human character. Philosophers and psychologists have proposed that cooperative activities are characterized by shared goals to which participants are committed through the ability to understand each other’s intentions. Despite its popularity, some serious issues arise with this approach to cooperation. First, one may challenge the assumption that high-level mental processes are necessary for engaging in acting cooperatively. If they are, then how do agents that do not possess such ability (preverbal children, or children with autism who are often claimed to be mind-blind) engage in cooperative exchanges, as the evidence suggests? Secondly, to define cooperation as the result of two de-contextualized minds reading each other’s intentions may fail to fully acknowledge the complexity of situated, interactional dynamics and the interplay of variables such as the participants’ relational and personal history and experience. In this paper we challenge such accounts of cooperation, calling for an embodied approach that sees cooperation not only as an individual attitude toward the other, but also as a property of interaction processes. Taking an enactive perspective, we argue that cooperation is an intrinsic part of any interaction, and that there can be cooperative interaction before complex communicative abilities are achieved. The issue then is not whether one is able or not to read the other’s intentions, but what it takes to participate in joint action. From this basic account, it should be possible to build up more complex forms of cooperation as needed. Addressing the study of cooperation in these terms may enhance our understanding of human social development, and foster our knowledge of different ways of engaging with others, as in the case of autism.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: School of Psychology > Psychology
Subjects: Q Science > QZ Psychology
Depositing User: Nicola Yuill
Date Deposited: 21 Oct 2014 12:40
Last Modified: 22 Mar 2017 17:23
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/50681

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update