Conceptualizing 'hostility' for hate crime law: minding 'the minutiae' when interpreting section 28(1)(a) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998

Walters, Mark Austin (2014) Conceptualizing 'hostility' for hate crime law: minding 'the minutiae' when interpreting section 28(1)(a) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34 (1). pp. 47-74. ISSN 0143-6503

This is the latest version of this item.

[img] PDF - Published Version
Restricted to SRO admin only

Download (196kB)

Abstract

In 1998 the then Labour Government took the controversial step of criminalising racially aggravated offences under the Crime and Disorder Act. Since then, several governments have enacted a number of statutes which have specifically proscribed various types of hate crime. Key to the provisions has been that prosecutors must prove the offender is either (partly) "motivated" by, or "demonstrates", "hostility" based on the victim's race, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, transgender and/or disability. While many scholars have critically analysed the social value of creating such offences, few have examined the intricacies of the provisions. Of greatest significance is that the law remains unclear on what the word "hostility", central to the provisions, actually means. This article therefore examines how the relevant sections of the Crime and Disorder Act have been interpreted by the courts, noting that much confusion and resistance remains within the lower courts. The article argues that to avoid future confusion in the law, the word "hostility" must be interpreted to include, not only acts that are motivated by, or which are intended to express bias, prejudice and hatred, but also any offence which involves conduct where the offender is aware that such conduct is likely to be perceived by others as an act of prejudice or hatred. Conceptualizing hostility in such a broad manner is important to the creation of a society which rejects public displays of identity-based prejudice. The article concludes that a broad interpretation of the law is additionally justified based on the harmful effects that incidents have on victims and potentially the communities they come from.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: School of Law, Politics and Sociology > Law
Subjects: K Law > K Law in General. Comparative and uniform Law. Jurisprudence > K0520 Comparative law. International uniform law > K5000 Criminal law and procedure
K Law > KD Law of the United Kingdom and Ireland > KD0051 England and Wales
Depositing User: Mark Walters
Date Deposited: 11 Mar 2014 11:10
Last Modified: 07 Mar 2017 06:57
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/47810

Available Versions of this Item

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update