Early detection and intervention evaluation for people at risk of psychosis: multisite randomised controlled trial

Morrison, Anthony P, French, Paul, Stewart, Suzanne L K, Birchwood, Max, Fowler, David, Gumley, Andrew I, Jones, Peter B, Bentall, Richard P, Lewis, Shôn W, Murray, Graham K, Patterson, Paul, Brunet, Kat, Conroy, Jennie, Parker, Sophie, Reilly, Tony, Byrne, Rory, Davies, Linda M and Dunn, Graham (2012) Early detection and intervention evaluation for people at risk of psychosis: multisite randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 344. e2233. ISSN 1756-1833

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether cognitive therapy is effective in preventing the worsening of emerging psychotic symptoms experienced by help seeking young people deemed to be at risk for serious conditions such as schizophrenia.

DESIGN

Multisite single blind randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Diverse services at five UK sites.

PARTICIPANTS

288 participants aged 14-35 years (mean 20.74, SD 4.34 years) at high risk of psychosis: 144 were assigned to cognitive therapy plus monitoring of mental state and 144 to monitoring of mental state only. Participants were followed-up for a minimum of 12 months and a maximum of 24 months.

INTERVENTION

Cognitive therapy (up to 26 (mean 9.1) sessions over six months) plus monitoring of mental state compared with monitoring of mental state only.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was scores on the comprehensive assessment of at risk mental states (CAARMS), which provides a dichotomous transition to psychosis score and ordinal scores for severity of psychotic symptoms and distress. Secondary outcomes included emotional dysfunction and quality of life.

RESULTS

Transition to psychosis based on intention to treat was analysed using discrete time survival models. Overall, the prevalence of transition was lower than expected (23/288; 8%), with no significant difference between the two groups (proportional odds ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 1.68). Changes in severity of symptoms and distress, as well as secondary outcomes, were analysed using random effects regression (analysis of covariance) adjusted for site and baseline symptoms. Distress from psychotic symptoms did not differ (estimated difference at 12 months -3.00, 95% confidence interval -6.95 to 0.94) but their severity was significantly reduced in the group assigned to cognitive therapy (estimated between group effect size at 12 months -3.67, -6.71 to -0.64, P=0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive therapy plus monitoring did not significantly reduce transition to psychosis or symptom related distress but reduced the severity of psychotic symptoms in young people at high risk. Most participants in both groups improved over time. The results have important implications for the at risk mental state concept.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN56283883.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: School of Psychology > Psychology
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion
Depositing User: Lene Hyltoft
Date Deposited: 11 Oct 2013 07:36
Last Modified: 11 Oct 2013 07:36
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/46628
📧 Request an update