Danone v. Wahaha: who laughs last?

Bu, Qingxiu (2011) Danone v. Wahaha: who laughs last? European Journal of Law Reform, 13 (3-4). pp. 614-628. ISSN 1387‐2370

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (284kB) | Preview

Abstract

Multinational Companies may result in culture clashes, incompatibility of Western corporate governance and legal resolution strategies. As one of the most successful joint venture models, the high-profile Danone/Wahaha dispute has been accelerated into a two-year legal feud against the infringement of the famous brand of WAHAHA across jurisdictions. The case represents a significant watershed which reflects the status quo of controversies over cooperation and competition in China. Under the current legal framework, Danone’s withdrawal would serve as a wake-up call for both foreign investors and Chinese companies in the dramatically increasing cross-border merger & acquisitions. The seminal case perfectly illustrates unwritten issues about public opinion, nationalism and the rule of law. Danone v. Wahaha has also been commonly conceived as a landmark case through which Chinese side may verify the fairness of the Western judicial system, while the European party may regard it as a touchstone for China’s investment environment as well as the specific sphere of contract spirit. It also offers myriad lessons, including the need for watertight contracts, IP rights, and international arbitrations.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: School of Law, Politics and Sociology > Law
Subjects: K Law > K Law in General. Comparative and uniform Law. Jurisprudence > K0520 Comparative law. International uniform law > K1000 Commercial law
K Law > KZ Law of Nations
Depositing User: Qingxiu Bu
Date Deposited: 08 Jul 2013 14:18
Last Modified: 06 Mar 2017 09:30
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/45622

Available Versions of this Item

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update