Elites and the ‘organised public’: who drives British immigration politics and in which direction?

Statham, Paul and Geddes, Andrew (2006) Elites and the ‘organised public’: who drives British immigration politics and in which direction? West European Politics, 29 (2). pp. 248-269. ISSN 0140-2382

[img] PDF - Published Version
Restricted to SRO admin only

Download (765kB)

Abstract

This article examines the role of the ‘organised public’, collective action by interest groups and non-governmental organisations (NGOs), in British immigration politics. The impact of the ‘organised public’ on policy outcomes has been a subject for theoretical speculation, especially by Gary Freeman. Here the authors test some of Freeman’s assumptions regarding what political mechanisms could account for what he sees as a persistent ‘gap’ between expansionist policies and restrictive public opinion through recourse to original empirical evidence. Their findings largely go against Freeman’s predictions. Immigration is an elite-led highly institutionalised field with a relatively weak level of civil society engagement. Elites dominate the field and hold a decisively restrictionist stance. This points toward an explanation where the direction of immigration policies is not an outcome of an organised pro-migrant lobby winning over a resource-weak diffuse anti-migrant lobby, as Freeman suggests, but determined in a relatively autonomous way by political elites.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: School of Global Studies > Geography
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
J Political Science
Depositing User: Paul Statham
Date Deposited: 02 May 2013 10:44
Last Modified: 13 Mar 2017 10:49
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/44602

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update