Development of a scale to measure stigma related to podoconiosis in Southern Ethiopia

Franklin, Hannah, Tora, Abebayehu, Deribe, Kebede, Reda, Ayalu A and Davey, Gail (2013) Development of a scale to measure stigma related to podoconiosis in Southern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health, 13 (298). ISSN 1471-2458

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (195kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background:

Health-related stigma adds to the physical and economic burdens experienced by people suffering from neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Previous research into the NTD podoconiosis showed significant stigma towards those with the disease, yet no formal instrument exists by which to assess stigma or interventions to reduce stigma. We aimed to develop, pilot and validate scales to measure the extent of stigma towards podoconiosis among patients and in podoconiosis-endemic communities.

Methods:
Indicators of stigma were drawn from existing qualitative podoconiosis research and a literature review on measuring leprosy stigma. These were then formulated into items for questioning and evaluated through a Delphi process in which irrelevant items were discounted. The final items formed four scales measuring two distinct forms of stigma (felt stigma and enacted stigma) for those with podoconiosis and those without the disease. The scales were formatted as two questionnaires, one for podoconiosis patients and one for unaffected community members. 150 podoconiosis patients and 500 unaffected community members from Wolaita zone, Southern Ethiopia were selected through multistage random sampling to complete the questionnaires which were interview-administered. The scales were evaluated through reliability assessment, content and construct validity analysis of
the items, factor analysis and internal consistency analysis.

Results:

All scales had Cronbach’s alpha over 0.7, indicating good consistency. The content and construct validity of the scales were satisfactory with modest correlation between items. There was significant correlation between the felt and enacted stigma scales among patients (Spearman’s r = 0.892; p < 0.001) and within the community (Spearman’s r = 0.794; p < 0.001).

Conclusion:

We report the development and testing of the first standardised measures of podoconiosis stigma. Although further research is needed to validate the scales in other contexts, we anticipate they will be useful in situational analysis and in designing, monitoring and evaluating interventions. The scales will enable an evidencebased approach to mitigating stigma which will enable implementation of more effective disease control and help
break the cycle of poverty and NTDs.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: Brighton and Sussex Medical School > Global Health and Infection
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Depositing User: Gail Davey
Date Deposited: 02 May 2013 11:52
Last Modified: 04 Aug 2017 18:56
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/44593

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update