Reid’s direct realism
 and visible figure

Wilson, Keith A (2013) Reid’s direct realism
 and visible figure. The Philosophical Quarterly, 63 (253). pp. 783-803. ISSN 1467-9213

[img] PDF - Published Version
Restricted to SRO admin only

Download (108kB)

Abstract

In his account of visual perception, Thomas Reid describes visible figure as both ‘real and external’ to the eye and as the ‘immediate object of sight’. These claims appear to conflict with Reid’s direct realism, since if the ‘immediate’ object of vision is also its direct object, then sight would be perceptually indirect due to the role of visible figure as a perceptual intermediary. I argue that this apparent threat to Reid’s direct realism may be resolved by understanding visible figure as the set of geometrical properties that holds between an object’s visible surfaces and some particular perspective or point of view. On this relational interpretation of visible figure, and once an ambiguity over the use of the term ‘object’ is resolved, Reid’s account of vision is both epistemically and perceptually direct, as well as consistent with his account of the other senses and doctrine of signs.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: School of History, Art History and Philosophy > Art History
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Depositing User: Keith Wilson
Date Deposited: 18 Mar 2013 12:39
Last Modified: 07 Mar 2017 06:42
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/43488

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update