Compensating biodiversity loss: the EU Commission’s approach to compensation under Article 6 of the habitats directive

Mcgillivray, Donald (2012) Compensating biodiversity loss: the EU Commission’s approach to compensation under Article 6 of the habitats directive. Journal of Environmental Law, 24 (3). pp. 417-450. ISSN 0952-8873

[img] PDF - Published Version
Restricted to SRO admin only

Download (304kB)

Abstract

This Article assesses that part of the legal obligation to provide for compensatory habitat under Article 6(4) of the EU Habitats Directive which requires an opinion from the European Commission. This is located within a wider ‘impact neutrality’ context where such offsetting measures are increasingly being advanced. The literature on compensatory habitat, some of which relates to site-specific measures and some to habitat ‘banking’, is considered in order to map how compensatory measures may be prone to failure. This is done against the criteria of functionality, proponent bias, monitoring and enforceability, and economic influence. These are then used to evaluate the Commission’s opinions under the Directive. While the compensation obligation is to be applauded, the Commission’s opinions fare poorly against all these criteria, a common, and important, thread being a lack of transparency. This calls into question the wider compensatory aspects of the legislation.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Habitats, ‘no net loss’, compensation, EU law, Habitats Directive 92/43, Article 6(4), Commission opinions
Schools and Departments: School of Law, Politics and Sociology > Law
Subjects: K Law > KJ Europe
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Donald McGillivray
Date Deposited: 15 Jan 2013 10:24
Last Modified: 08 Mar 2017 07:28
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/43458

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update