Should the Prime Minster be directly elected? Written evidence to The House of Commons Select Committee on Political and Constitutional Reform inquiry into the role and powers of the Prime Minister, February 2011

Webb, Paul (2011) Should the Prime Minster be directly elected? Written evidence to The House of Commons Select Committee on Political and Constitutional Reform inquiry into the role and powers of the Prime Minister, February 2011. Unset. Parliament, London.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This is a an invited submission of written evidence to a House of Commons Select Committee inquiry into the role and powers of the Prime Minister. Specifically, it addresses the question of whether the British prime minister should be directly elected by the people. It answers 'emphatically not', citing comparative evidence from around the world, notably Israel.

Item Type: Reports and working papers (Unset)
Schools and Departments: School of Law, Politics and Sociology > Politics
Subjects: J Political Science > J General legislative and executive papers
Depositing User: Paul Webb
Date Deposited: 01 Nov 2012 16:48
Last Modified: 06 Jun 2013 09:28
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/41329
📧 Request an update