University of Sussex
Browse
HopkinsTASM.pdf (570.51 kB)

Just how difficult can it be counting up R&D funding for emerging technologies (and is tech mining with proxy measures going to be any better?)

Download (570.51 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 11:55 authored by Michael HopkinsMichael Hopkins, Josh SiepelJosh Siepel
Decision makers considering policy or strategy related to the development of emerging technologies expect high quality data on the support for different technological options. A natural starting point would be R&D funding statistics. This paper explores the limitations of such aggregated data in relation to the substance and quantification of funding for emerging technologies. Using biotechnology as an illustrative case, we test the utility of a novel taxonomy to demonstrate the endemic weaknesses in the availability and quality of data from public and private sources. Using the same taxonomy, we consider the extent to which tech-mining presents an alternative, or potentially complementary, way to determine support for emerging technologies using proxy measures such as patents and scientific publications.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

ISSN

0953-7325

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Issue

6

Volume

25

Page range

655-685

Department affiliated with

  • SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit Publications

Notes

Special Issue: Tech Mining for Innovation Management

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2013-05-28

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2015-02-13

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2014-01-23

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC