Credit where credit's due: Accounting for co-authorship in citation counts

Tol, Richard S J (2011) Credit where credit's due: Accounting for co-authorship in citation counts. Scientometrics, 89 (1). pp. 291-299. ISSN 0138-9130

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

I propose a new method (Pareto weights) to objectively attribute citations to co-authors. Previous methods either profess ignorance about the seniority of co-authors (egalitarian weights) or are based in an ad hoc way on the order of authors (rank weights). Pareto weights are based on the respective citation records of the co-authors. Pareto weights are proportional to the probability of observing the number of citations obtained. Assuming a Pareto distribution, such weights can be computed with a simple, closed-form equation but require a few iterations and data on a scholar, her co-authors, and her co-authors' co-authors. The use of Pareto weights is illustrated with a group of prominent economists. In this case, Pareto weights are very different from rank weights. Pareto weights are more similar to egalitarian weights but can deviate up to a quarter in either direction (for reasons that are intuitive).

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: School of Business, Management and Economics > Economics
Subjects: Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources > Z0665 Library Science. Information Science
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Richard Tol
Date Deposited: 23 Apr 2012 08:18
Last Modified: 23 Apr 2012 08:18
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/38232
📧 Request an update