University of Sussex
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Group Size and Direct Fitness in Social Queues

journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 08:13 authored by Gavin Shreeves, Jeremy Field
We explore the effects of group size on the direct reproductive success of subordinate helpers in eusocial animals where only a single, dominant individual reproduces at one time. Helpers can reproduce directly if they inherit dominance, but when dominance is age based, an individual born into a larger group has a longer wait to inherit. We show that this disincentive to help can potentially be offset by increased productivity, increased life span, and insurance-based benefits for helpers if they survive to inherit dominance in larger groups. We analyze a field experiment in which group size was manipulated in the hover wasp Liostenogaster flavolineata. Productivity increased linearly with group size, larger groups were less likely to fail, and dominants in larger groups may have lived longer. Combined with the probability of inheriting dominance, these effects led overall to a negative correlation between group size and expected direct fitness, mainly because group size decreased during our study period, so that helpers could not expect to inherit as large a group as they started queuing in. Our analysis suggests that the relationship between group size and productivity plays a central role in determining the fitness consequences of helping.

History

Publication status

  • Published

Journal

American Naturalist

ISSN

0003-0147

Publisher

University of Chicago Press

Issue

1

Volume

159

Page range

81-95

Pages

15.0

Department affiliated with

  • Evolution, Behaviour and Environment Publications

Notes

Shows for the first time how group size-related benefits could account for helping in social queues, with both theory and empirical data. I was the PI of this NERC-funded project. I devised the experiments, carried out all of the work together with my co-author, and co-wrote the paper.

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2012-02-06

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC