Schema-Driven Information Processing in Judgements About Rape

Krahé, Barbara, Temkin, Jennifer and Bieneck, Steffen (2007) Schema-Driven Information Processing in Judgements About Rape. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21 (5). pp. 1-20. ISSN 0888-4080

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Two studies addressed the impact of rape schemata on judgements about rape cases. In Study 1, 286 undergraduate students rated perpetrator and victim blame for five rape scenarios and completed the Perceived Causes of Rape Scale. Most blame was assigned to victims of an ex-partner rape, followed by acquaintance and stranger rape. Least blame was assigned to perpetrators of ex-partner rapes, followed by acquaintance and stranger rapes. Female precipitation beliefs increased victim blame and reduced perpetrator blame. In Study 2, 158 students rated rape scenarios that varied in victim perpetrator relationship and coercive strategy and completed a measure of Female Precipitation Beliefs. Half expected to be held accountable for their judgements. The perpetrator was held less liable and the victim blamed more when the perpetrator exploited the victim's incapacitated state versus using physical force. Accountability instruction reduced the impact of female precipitation beliefs on perceived perpetrator liability and victim blame.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: School of History, Art History and Philosophy > Philosophy
Depositing User: Jennifer Temkin
Date Deposited: 06 Feb 2012 20:37
Last Modified: 30 Mar 2012 13:41
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/26989
📧 Request an update