A Comparison of A-level Performance in Economics and Business Studies: How Much More Difficult is Economics?

Reilly, Barry and Bachan, Ray (2005) A Comparison of A-level Performance in Economics and Business Studies: How Much More Difficult is Economics? Education Economics, 13 (1). pp. 85-108. ISSN 0964-5292

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (193kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper uses ALIS data to compare academic performance in two subjects often viewed as relatively close substitutes for one another at A-level. The important role of GCSE achievement is confirmed for both subjects. There is evidence of strong gender effects and variation in outcomes across Examination Boards. A counterfactual exercise suggests that if the sample of Business Studies candidates had studied Economics nearly 40% of those who obtained a grade C or better in the former subject would not have done so in the latter. The opposite exercise uggests that 12% more Economics candidates would have achieved a grade C or better if they had taken Business Studies. In order to render a Business Studies A-level grade comparable to an Economics one in terms of relative difficulty, we estimate that a downward adjustment of 1.5 UCAS points should be applied to the former subject. This adjustment is lower than that suggested by correction factors based on conventional subject pair analysis for these two subjects.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Business Studies, Economics, subject difficulty, ordered probit
Schools and Departments: School of Business, Management and Economics
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic theory. Demography
H Social Sciences > HA Statistics
L Education > L Education (General)
Depositing User: Chris Keene
Date Deposited: 19 Feb 2008
Last Modified: 07 Mar 2017 06:32
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/1341
Google Scholar:10 Citations

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update